Academic integrity
Evidence must be represented accurately; authorship, contribution and sources must be attributed; fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are incompatible with Academy work.
Operative principleGovernance
These principles apply to Academy elections, honours, publications, meetings, governance and public communications.
Evidence must be represented accurately; authorship, contribution and sources must be attributed; fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are incompatible with Academy work.
Operative principleRelevant interests are declared before access to papers or deliberation. The chair records the management of an interest, including recusal where impartial judgement may reasonably be questioned.
Operative principleAcademic work is assessed against published criteria and in its disciplinary context. Protected characteristics, institutional prestige and personal association are not substitutes for evidence.
Operative principleNomination, assessment, governance and correspondence records are limited to persons with a defined role, retained according to purpose and protected against unauthorised disclosure.
Operative principleAuthorship, review and approval are identified. Substantiated errors are corrected promptly; material changes and withdrawals remain visible in the publication record.
Operative principleCorrections, procedural complaints and conduct concerns are considered by a person without a material conflict. Outcomes give reasons and identify any available review.
Operative principleWebsite information
Current information about this website is available below.